Click the image below to register in one click ▼ In the daily operations and management of distributors, compensation assessment is undoubtedly a fundamental yet extremely important task. A reasonable compensation assessment system can not only fully mobilize employees' enthusiasm but also ensure the company's sustainable development and internal stability. However, some distributors do not perform well in this regard, even exposing many problems. Next, let's analyze the nine 'peculiar' phenomena hidden behind distributor compensation management, hoping to inspire readers. 1 The boss drives employees, but employees lack initiative Many distributor bosses complain that promoting new products always fails. Where's the problem? Nine out of ten answer: employees lack initiative. So why do employees lack initiative? It's conceivable that when a salesperson faces a new product, not only is it hard to sell, but the commission is the same as for old products—who would be willing to promote it? But salespeople won't tell the boss it's because they don't earn money, so they hide the compensation loophole in time and then report to the boss: the product is hard to sell, the market doesn't accept it, we can't push it! It seems like a product issue, but it's actually a compensation issue. If employees are indifferent to the compensation assessment system and cannot exert their own initiative and proactivity—if it's not employees pulling the company forward but the boss driving employees—then the compensation assessment system is ineffective. Therefore, distributors must establish a compensation assessment system from the bottom up to fully mobilize employees' motivation and vitality. 2 Assessment goals are visible but unattainable Generally, distributors' employees' performance pay is linked to the achievement rate of overall performance goals. For example, some companies stipulate that if overall performance is below 70%, the assessment is zero; above 70%, it increases proportionally; above 100%, additional bonuses are given. Then the question arises: what if the overall performance goal of 70% is not achieved? At that point, employees can't get the expected salary, and the whole team's laziness, complaints, and grumbles come out all at once. After two or three months, they find the assessment can no longer be implemented. What to do? To improve employee enthusiasm, the boss decides to increase the flexibility of the assessment, temporarily lowering the performance target to 60%, but after a month it returns to 70%. As a result, some employees who made 400,000 last month got 5,000 yuan, but this month they made 500,000 and only got 3,000 yuan, making them even more dissatisfied with the assessment. This shows that some distributors' compensation assessment systems seem reasonable but are actually difficult to implement. If employees can see but not touch, the assessment loses its due role and value. 3 Happy about rewards, but upset about penalties In the compensation assessment system, some parts only reward without penalties, such as performance commissions; other parts only penalize without rewards, such as daily attendance. For employees, work is to earn money, so they naturally welcome company rewards, but once penalties are involved, it inevitably creates some opposition between the company and employees. Of course, bosses have many ways to ease and handle this opposition, but they cannot tolerate situations where there are 'only rewards without penalties' or 'penalties cannot be enforced'. To this end, the authority, fairness, and timeliness of the compensation assessment system must be established. Rewards should be implemented properly, and penalties should be strictly enforced. For example, 'not being late, not being absent without leave, and not leaving early' are the basic principles of the attendance system. Whoever violates them must be penalized according to the rules, and it should be implemented immediately without delay. But bosses must understand that penalties are only a means, not the goal. The key is to serve as a warning to employees, thereby guiding their behavior and achieving standardized management. 4 Back-office finance, warehousing, etc., are disconnected from performance assessment Many distributor companies also have this phenomenon: every day at quitting time, some customers urge delivery, salespeople urgently call the warehouse, the warehouse keeper says it's off duty, then contact the driver, the driver says he's drunk, so what can be done? Finally, they find the boss, who has no choice but to make the trip personally. Why does this happen? Because the company's sales performance is not directly related to the assessment of a warehouse keeper, driver, or finance person, which leads to an overall lack of service awareness in non-marketing departments. Therefore, distributors need to implement the concept of 'all-employee marketing' for every back-office service personnel: we don't directly serve customers, but we serve those who serve customers. Moreover, this concept should be implemented in assessments, such as linking the performance assessment of back-office departments and personnel to the company's overall performance. If sales performance is good, they get corresponding rewards; otherwise, they suffer losses together. Only in this way can the service awareness of back-office departments and personnel be effectively strengthened. 5 Emphasizing performance assessment but neglecting cost control Distributors usually use performance assessment as the main basis for evaluating employee compensation, but they easily overlook the importance of cost control in compensation management. When the company's cost increase rate remains high, even exceeding the performance increase rate, the boss suddenly realizes that the purpose of performance assessment is not only to improve efficiency but also to reduce consumption. The reason for saying this is that under a sales-oriented business assessment model, the sales team will continuously demand promotions, staffing, and expenses to pursue sales volume. Although employees' performance appears outstanding on the surface, it is actually based on high costs. To this end, distributors must establish cost control awareness in the performance assessment process and link it to employee compensation. For example, using the average operating cost of the past three months as a reference, reward teams or individuals with significant cost control improvements with a certain proportion of the monthly cost savings, guiding employees to focus not only on sales volume but also on profits. 6 The assessment system is 'scientific' but not adapted to local conditions Now, more and more distributors are introducing modern corporate management systems and models, pursuing the establishment of more complete compensation assessment systems. However, during implementation, they may encounter issues of not adapting to local conditions. Many distributors ask: My compensation assessment system is more scientific, why doesn't it achieve the expected results? In fact, a company's compensation assessment method is built on the basis of running-in with team members and is closely related to its own development history and corporate culture. If you simply adopt a 'copycat' approach, it's hard to achieve the same effect. Therefore, different compensation assessment methods are not strictly right or wrong; they are only suitable or unsuitable. For example, for a family-style distributor just starting out, employees are all cousins, nephews, brothers-in-law, and other relatives. The boss can't assess too meticulously, so it's better to let the meat rot in the pot. Today, someone goes out to pull a cart, how much fuel money, how much profit, how much salary—although simple, it is the most practical and effective assessment method at the moment. 7 Compensation is not lower than others, but still can't retain people When designing their compensation assessment system, distributors naturally refer to market conditions, such as local income levels and salary treatments in the same industry. If the compensation offered is lower than the market rate, it will be difficult to recruit suitable people, and even if they are recruited, it's hard to retain them. However, there is another situation: the company's compensation is not low, even significantly higher than other companies in the same industry. Why do employees still choose to leave? First, it must be acknowledged that the level of compensation is an important factor affecting employee stability. Distributors not only need competitive compensation to attract talent but also need secure compensation to retain talent. If a high-paid employee chooses to leave, it may be because they feel the high pay lacks security or is hard to maintain in the long term. Second, compensation is not everything. Work environment, management style, workplace relationships, promotion space, etc., can all influence employees' decisions to stay or leave. This requires distributors to give employees more attention and opportunities from the perspective of career planning and development. 8 Positions become scarce resources, limiting salary and promotion Employees work for the boss not only to earn money but also to gain ability improvement and positions matching their abilities. Conversely, position promotion naturally brings higher salaries and greater development space. However, in most distributor companies, there are generally only three job levels: manager, supervisor, and salesperson. Correspondingly, positions become a scarce resource. Employees may work for several years without being promoted to supervisor or even manager. Even if their work ability and level meet the requirements, they may not get promotion opportunities and can only achieve salary increases through other means and channels. This reflects from one side that the promotion mechanism of distributors has problems. Why not set up deputy managers under managers? Can't more positions be added under each job level? In short, distributors need to incorporate employee promotion into the compensation assessment system to exert greater incentive effects. 9 'Money-only' thinking prevails, and spiritual incentives are ignored The value of compensation lies in motivating employees' work enthusiasm and initiative. This incentive is reflected not only in the substantive economic value the company pays employees, such as wages, bonuses, allowances, and benefits, but also in the spiritual value derived from the satisfaction employees gain during work. However, in many bosses' eyes, compensation is just money: 'I pay you, you work.' That's it. 'Money-only' thinking is a very typical and primitive compensation management concept, especially in the current context of generally high economic life pressure, where money has become the most direct form of value expression for compensation. But we cannot ignore employees' inner needs for respect and self-realization. If everything is about money, then over time, employees will lose their sense of belonging to the company. In reality, in many private enterprises, including distributors, senior executives and entrepreneurial partners leave not because of too little money, but because their 'spiritual value' has not been appropriately incentivized. Click 'Read the original text' to register for the strongest event at the Autumn Sugar Fair. See you in Nanjing on the 26th!↓↓↓