Warm Reminder Click ↑ "FMCG Distributor Professional Consulting" for more marketing and distributor internal management content.
Among the various accusations manufacturers level at distributors, misappropriating manufacturer funds (including materials) often ranks in the top three.
There are many ways distributors misappropriate manufacturer funds; common ones include:
- Withholding channel promotion resources intended for downstream customers (distributors and retailers), e.g., changing a "buy 100 get 5 free" to "buy 100 get 3 free";
- Selling promotional materials and display equipment provided by the manufacturer as scrap;
- Inflating terminal entry fees;
- Inflating the number of outlets during distribution;
- Adding expenses from one product to another at retail outlets;
- Inflating inventory to claim price adjustment subsidies;
- Inflating after-sales service costs and consumer complaint handling costs;
- Inflating wages for local promotional staff;
- Inflating costs for local market activities, or even fabricating activities entirely;
- Inflating advertising costs for local media placements;
- Exploiting purchase reward tiers by stocking up early and later requesting quality returns or special price treatment; ...
In short, these behaviors turn the manufacturer's market investments directly into the distributor's personal income. This disrupts the manufacturer's overall planning and market development, directly harming brand building, distribution and terminal maintenance, and consumer loyalty.
Such incidents have a long history and are a common topic in distributor management discussions. Some manufacturers see this as clear evidence of distributors' short-sightedness, profit-driven mentality, typical small-farmer thinking, and individual-business mindset. It directly harms the market and the manufacturer-distributor relationship, and also undermines the distributor's own long-term development.
Actually, from the distributor's perspective, there are reasons for misappropriating manufacturer funds:
1. Distributor's profit model Business is about making money, but manufacturers and distributors earn differently. Manufacturers focus on strategic profits, emphasizing overall planning, global deployment, early investment, and later returns. Distributors focus on tactical profits, emphasizing speed, simplicity, and immediate gains. Manufacturers care about brand building, market development, and pricing systems, while distributors prefer to see money now, such as directly intercepting resources meant for terminals and consumers.
2. "This is mine" Some distributors believe that all manufacturer investments in the local market are based on product distribution. Since the distributor has paid for the goods, the ownership of these goods is theirs. The manufacturer invests resources in these products, and since the products are theirs, the related market resources are naturally theirs too. Moreover, the local market is theirs, so resources invested there are given to them. Once given, how they use them is their business.
3. Skepticism about the manufacturer's future As distributors who have operated in the local market for years, they have seen many manufacturers and products. They know which manufacturers are worth long-term cooperation and which products deserve attention. After cooperating for a while, they can judge based on the manufacturer's strength, business philosophy and model, the quality of its sales staff, product quality, and sales performance. If they see no long-term prospects, they might as well take what they can now.
4. Manufacturer's profit margin In the partnership, profit levels are not transparent. The manufacturer knows how much the distributor earns from selling goods, but the distributor does not know how much the manufacturer earns from selling to them. Most distributors believe the manufacturer earns more than they do. So, on one hand, they try to get more market investment from the manufacturer; on the other, they try to intercept it.
5. Challenging the manufacturer's control measures Chinese people inherently don't easily submit to others. Manufacturers often treat distributors as subordinates, issuing demands and regulations, which irritates distributors and triggers rebellious feelings. The more control measures, the more they want to challenge them. If the manufacturer says these funds are for the market and cannot be intercepted, and even imposes supervision and assessment, the distributor will deliberately do it to prove their capability surpasses the manufacturer's controls.
6. Keeping it for their own use Most distributors are locals doing local business, familiar with the local market and experienced in operations. They often dismiss the manufacturer's market plans as generic, not tailored to local specifics. They also find the manufacturer's sales staff lacking in operational skills, so using these resources would be wasteful. Better to keep them and allocate according to local conditions.
7. Believing the manufacturer's sales staff will also misappropriate After dealing with the manufacturer's sales staff, some distributors find them untrustworthy, eyeing the manufacturer's local investments. If they don't act first, the sales staff will take it. So, better to strike first.
8. Uncertainty about long-term returns Although manufacturers explain the necessity of market investment and future returns, distributors have seen many manufacturers change—some that were fine in the first half of the year go bankrupt in the second half. Given such volatility, long-term returns are uncertain. Without guaranteed returns, it's safer to take immediate income.
9. Instability of distribution rights Even if the manufacturer is a strong enterprise with a reliable long-term product, distribution rights are not stable. Contracts are signed annually, and there's no guarantee of renewal. Sometimes, a change in senior management leads to distributor replacement. Even if not replaced, product or channel segmentation occurs. This instability undermines the distributor's confidence in market development, making them see no need to invest in market-building with the manufacturer's resources.
10. Lack of effective monitoring and accounting systems Although manufacturers claim to monitor market investment and conduct financial accounting, few truly monitor every distributor throughout the process. Most monitoring systems are superficial, covering only a few distributors, or are tools for internal political struggles. Even fewer can present investment-return calculations to distributors.
Without systematic monitoring and timely return-on-investment visibility, distributors naturally feel bold and justified in misappropriating manufacturer funds.
11. Led by the manufacturer's sales staff In some cases, distributors are reluctant, but certain manufacturer sales staff are overly eager, instigating or even coercing distributors to participate.
-------------------------------------- Like this article? Feel free to click the top right corner to share to your circle of friends;
About us: WeChat Name: FMCG Distributor Professional Consulting Management Account Intro: 20 years of FMCG distributor operation and management experience, professionally targeting distributor internal affairs:
Click the "Read Original" below to enter our micro-community for interactive communication and questions. Learning and Exchange QQ Group: 344257092 Reply 1 to enter the micro-official website to view historical messages. -----------------------------------------