Friendly Reminder: Click the blue text above, “快消品经销商专业咨询” (FMCG Distributor Professional Consulting), to learn more about marketing and distributor internal management.
When distributors select new products, they must consider not only whether the product has selling points but also how it complements their existing product mix. Among the products they distribute, which ones are the "profit makers" and which are the "weapons"?
Distinct Characteristics of Three Brand Tiers
Based on the level of distribution gross profit margins, fast-moving consumer goods can be broadly divided into three categories, which we may call first-tier, second-tier, and third-tier brands.
First-tier brands include some world-class international brands such as Coca-Cola, Wyeth, Unilever, Nestlé, and Dove; they also include well-known domestic brands such as Wahaha, Yili, and Mengniu. Generally, first-tier brands offer a low return on investment, commonly following a "6+1" or "7+1" profit model, i.e., 6%–7% distribution gross margin plus 1% annual rebate, with the highest distribution gross margin generally below 11%, and they typically implement a no-return policy. After deducting warehousing and distribution costs, personnel wages, expenses, losses, and taxes, net profit is minimal. However, first-tier brands have multiple advantages: they have strong brand support, products sell well, and the manufacturer provides a large terminal market maintenance team, making it relatively hassle-free for distributors to operate these brands; distributors can obtain shorter payment terms or even cash settlement from downstream distributors, ensuring rapid capital turnover and essentially no operational risk; sales volume is large, with annual regional sales ranging from several million to hundreds of millions. First-tier brands are usually "must-stock" items in the channel, allowing distributors to quickly build a sales network and obtain favorable trading terms with retail outlets.
Second-tier brands typically refer to brands with high product quality, no large-scale brand operations, but proactive and skilled channel promotion support. The return on investment for second-tier brands is relatively high, usually between 12% and 20%. The characteristics of second-tier brands are as follows: brand awareness is generally low, some appear as regional brands; there is no terminal market maintenance team or the team is small, so terminal maintenance is borne by the distributor, and the distribution gross margin includes terminal maintenance costs of approximately 1%–1.5% of sales; distributing second-tier brands can also generate high sales volume, with annual regional sales reaching several million or more; second-tier brand products have longer payment cycles in modern channels, requiring substantial capital and forcing distributors to bear corresponding bank interest; market management levels are lower and less standardized, placing higher demands on distributors.
Third-tier brands have essentially no brand awareness. They typically target low-income groups or narrow markets, or they impact the market with prices far below those of first- and second-tier brands in the same category. The characteristics of third-tier brands are as follows: low brand awareness, opaque pricing, and distribution gross margins reaching 30%–40% or more; due to lower quality and lack of good market planning, sales volume is generally small, with annual regional sales below several hundred thousand; they are prone to slow sales, with higher returns and losses; distributors must bear the risk of market investment costs; product life cycles are short. Distributors operating third-tier brands face high risks, but because distribution gross margins are as high as 30%–40%, it presents a picture of "infinite scenery at the perilous peak." Some distributors leverage their keen market observation skills to find products among the vast number of third-tier brands that meet local market demand, implementing "short, flat, fast" operations, and can achieve substantial gains. Operating third-tier brands requires continuous elimination of products and introduction of new ones to address the short product life cycle issue.
Optimal Product Operation Model for Distributors
Let us first analyze the returns from investing one million yuan of working capital separately in each of the three brand tiers.
Investing in first-tier brands: Assume a distribution gross margin of 7%. Using a typical warehouse sales model, distribution costs are 2%, personnel wages 1.2%, management expenses 0.3%, losses 0.2%, taxes 1.4%, and monthly interest 0.5%. Assume a payment period of 15 days, ignoring transit time, allowing two turnovers per month. Monthly net profit: (7% - 2% - 1.2% - 0.3% - 0.2% - 1.4% - 0.5%) × 1,000,000 × 2 = 28,000 yuan.
Investing in second-tier brands: Assume a distribution gross margin of 15%. Distribution costs are 2.5%, personnel wages 1.2%, management expenses 0.4%, losses 0.3%, taxes 1.8%, and monthly interest 0.5%. Assume a payment period of 60 days (varies by region and outlet), ignoring transit time, allowing one turnover every two months. Monthly net profit: [(15% - 2.5% - 1.2% - 0.4% - 0.3% - 1.8%) / 2 months - interest 0.5%] × 1,000,000 = 39,000 yuan.
Investing in third-tier brands: Assume a distribution gross margin of 30%. Distribution costs are 3%, personnel wages 1.5%, management expenses 0.6%, losses 1.5%, taxes 2.2%, monthly interest 0.5%, and market investment costs 6%. Assume a payment period of 75 days (varies by region and outlet), ignoring transit time, allowing one turnover every two and a half months. Monthly net profit: [(30% - 3% - 1.5% - 0.6% - 1.5% - 2.2% - 6%) / 2.5 months - interest 0.5%] × 1,000,000 = 55,800 yuan.
From the above analysis, we can see that investing solely in first-tier brands yields the least profit; investing solely in second-tier brands, despite longer payment periods, yields higher monthly profits; investing solely in third-tier brands yields the highest monthly profits.
In fact, if a distribution company operates solely with third-tier brands, although profits are highest, sales are very unstable, and it is difficult to establish influence in the channel, leaving negotiations with retail outlets at a constant disadvantage. Frequent "sudden death" of products can cause significant harm to the company's stable operations. Operating solely with second-tier brands, while offering higher profit and sales stability, requires substantial capital. Operating solely with first-tier brands, although sales are assured and risk is low, yields low profits.
Therefore, if a distribution company selects several brands from each of the three tiers and operates them in combination, it can complement the advantages of each tier, reduce opportunity costs, and achieve optimal profitability and operational stability.
In this operational mix, the role of first-tier brands: bear the basic operating costs of the company and ensure normal survival; bundle with second- and third-tier brands in negotiations with retail outlets to improve trading terms for the latter, such as shortening payment periods and reducing fixed monthly and annual deductions; assist second- and third-tier brands in rapidly covering the sales network; dilute distribution costs, wages, and management expenses for second- and third-tier brands; and fifth, contribute a certain amount of net profit.
The role of second-tier brands: after first-tier brands cover basic operating costs, second-tier brands become the main profit contributors; because first-tier brands have large sales volumes, distribution companies allocate substantial personnel, warehouse space, vehicles, etc., to meet operational needs, which become a heavy burden if distribution rights are lost for some reason. At this point, second-tier brands can ensure the company's normal survival and enhance its ability to resist risks; they also provide terminal market maintenance teams for third-tier brands.
The role of third-tier brands: with first- and second-tier brands as backing, third-tier brands further increase profit margins, and with careful control of losses, they can generate extremely high profits. Since third-tier brands have very small per-SKU sales, their sales weight should not be too large; otherwise, too many SKUs can lead to management issues and reduce profitability.
Generally, for a well-developed distribution company, the optimal product operation model is to control the sales weight of first-, second-, and third-tier brands at 40%, 40%, and 20%, respectively. At this point, the investment return per million yuan of capital can reach approximately three times that of investing solely in first-tier brands. Specifically, the optimal number of brands is 1–2 first-tier brands, 4–6 second-tier brands, and 5–8 third-tier brands.
Like this article? Feel free to click the top right corner to share it to your Moments.
About us: WeChat ID: 快消品经销商专业咨询管理 Account introduction: 20 years of experience in FMCG distributor operations and management, professionally focused on distributor internal matters.
Click the "阅读原文" (Read Original) below to enter our micro-community for interactive exchanges and questions.
Learning and exchange QQ group: 344257092
Reply 1 to enter the micro-official website to view historical messages.