---
title: "Private Label: A Remedy and a Poison"
description: "As Yonghui announces plans to develop 500 private label products over five years, Walmart completes its 'Marketside' brand upgrade, and Aldi leads the market with over 90% private label share, private label is shifting from a bonus to a must-answer question for more retailers. But the question becomes sharper: is private label the ultimate answer for retailers to break through development bottlenecks, or a phased choice in industrial upgrading? My judgment is that private label is a key node for reconstructing core competitiveness in retail, but by no means the end point. From the industry's development patterns, retail models evolve with consumer demand and technological innovation, with no permanent ultimate form; from practical logic, private label can solve traditional retail's pain points of thin profits and homogenization, but is constrained by category suitability and supply chain capabilities, unable to cover all consumption scenarios and needs."
author: "东南"
publisher: "New Distribution"
email: "zhaobo258@gmail.com"
telephone: "+8615854817671"
published: "2026-01-31"
categories: "Brand Marketing, Retail Formats"
language: "en"
canonical: "https://xinjignxiao.com/en/articles/private-label-a-remedy-and-a-poison-cf9b91cc/"
markdown: "https://xinjignxiao.com/en/articles/private-label-a-remedy-and-a-poison-cf9b91cc.md"
original_source: "https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/oEl0w9z4_P8bhZ2VAMwD8g"
translation: "https://xinjignxiao.com/zh/articles/%E8%87%AA%E6%9C%89%E5%93%81%E7%89%8C-%E6%98%AF%E8%A7%A3%E8%8D%AF-%E4%B9%9F%E6%98%AF%E6%AF%92%E8%8D%AF-cf9b91cc.md"
attribution: "New Distribution — https://xinjignxiao.com/en/articles/private-label-a-remedy-and-a-poison-cf9b91cc/"
citation: "东南. “Private Label: A Remedy and a Poison.” New Distribution, 2026-01-31. https://xinjignxiao.com/en/articles/private-label-a-remedy-and-a-poison-cf9b91cc/"
usage_policy: "https://xinjignxiao.com/ai-policy.txt"
---

# Private Label: A Remedy and a Poison

> As Yonghui announces plans to develop 500 private label products over five years, Walmart completes its 'Marketside' brand upgrade, and Aldi leads the market with over 90% private label share, private label is shifting from a bonus to a must-answer question for more retailers. But the question becomes sharper: is private label the ultimate answer for retailers to break through development bottlenecks, or a phased choice in industrial upgrading? My judgment is that private label is a key node for reconstructing core competitiveness in retail, but by no means the end point. From the industry's development patterns, retail models evolve with consumer demand and technological innovation, with no permanent ultimate form; from practical logic, private label can solve traditional retail's pain points of thin profits and homogenization, but is constrained by category suitability and supply chain capabilities, unable to cover all consumption scenarios and needs.

**When Yonghui announces plans to develop 500 private label products over five years, Walmart completes its 'Marketside' brand upgrade, and Aldi leads the market with over 90% private label share, it's clear that private label is shifting from a bonus to a must-answer question for more retailers.**
But the question becomes sharper: is private label the ultimate answer for retailers to break through development bottlenecks, or a phased choice in industrial upgrading?
My judgment is that private label is a key node for reconstructing core competitiveness in retail, but by no means the end point.
From the industry's development patterns, retail models always evolve dynamically with consumer demand and technological innovation, with no permanent ultimate form; from practical logic, private label can solve traditional retail's pain points of thin profits and homogenization, but is constrained by category suitability and supply chain capabilities, unable to cover all consumption scenarios and needs.
The rise of private label:
An inevitable choice for retail value reconstruction****
The explosion of private label is not accidental, but an inevitable result of the retail industry's return from 'channel dominance' to 'product focus'.
In traditional retail models, enterprises rely on brand suppliers for goods, becoming 'shelf renters', with profits diluted by intermediate links and losing core control over key aspects like product production, quality, and pricing.
Private label breaks this shackle through direct 'retail-production' connection. Industry data shows that private label products typically have gross margins 10%-30% higher than manufacturer brands. This profit improvement stems not from inflated prices, but from supply chain efficiency optimization and intermediate cost compression.
From the global development stages of private label, most markets have experienced a process of 'low-price volume → quality improvement → differentiated innovation'. Currently, private label can be divided into three categories:
  * Stage 1.0 focuses on low-price volume, emphasizing basic product functions, serving as the market's 'traffic base', covering the widest population with the highest consumption frequency, contributing over 80% of market sales volume;
  * Stage 2.0 features category selection, focusing on quality improvement and consumption experience optimization, with high demand gaps for new products, highest acceptance and growth rates, serving as the market's 'growth engine';
  * Stage 3.0 centers on differentiated advancement as core competitiveness, leveraging differentiated advantages like specialty ingredient application and innovative formula development. Despite growth potential, it's constrained by cultivation costs, currently with slightly lower growth rates.
These three development models are not mutually exclusive but can coexist and develop synergistically. Successful private labels need to build a product matrix of 'basic items for traffic, quality items for repeat purchases, and innovative items for premium pricing'. For example, in the juice category, Stage 3.0 new products can complement Stage 1.0 and 2.0 products, achieving simultaneous growth.
From the industry development process, China's private label market is at a critical stage of transitioning from Stage 1.0 introduction to Stage 2.0 growth. According to relevant industry data, the median sales share of China's private label industry is expected to rise to around 17%-19% by 2026.
Although this figure still lags significantly behind the 30%-50% share in mature European and American markets, it fully confirms the huge growth potential and incremental space of China's private label market.
From a global perspective, private label development varies significantly across countries and regions, with market share highly correlated with retail market concentration, consumer maturity, and economic cycles.
According to 2024 industry data: Europe has the highest private label sales share at 40%-45%, with brands like Switzerland's Migros and Coop, and Germany's Aldi and Lidl becoming industry benchmarks;
North America (US, Canada) is in a mature and diversified development stage with a 20%-25% share, dominated by industry giants like Costco and Walmart;
Japan, with a 16% share, has carved out a differentiated path of 'higher quality + lower price', becoming an industry 'top student';
In Southeast Asia, Latin America, and other regions, private label is still in early development, with shares generally below 10%, fragmented market structures, and private label playing only a low-price supplementary role.
Among these, China, as a high-growth emerging market, is transitioning from 'cheap substitutes' to 'quality-price ratio first choice', with increasingly evident channel differentiation.
## **Three Boundary Constraints on Private Label Development******
Equating private label with the retail end point essentially ignores the core logic that retail is 'always consumer-centric', while also underestimating the complexity and dynamism of market competition.
At least currently, private label development faces three boundaries:
The first boundary is **the limitation of category penetration**.
Private label expansion shows a clear 'from easy to difficult' pattern, progressing rapidly in high-penetration categories with low brand attention like food and beverages and daily necessities, where products are highly standardized (e.g., bottled water, juice) and consumer perceived differences are small (e.g., sugar, cooking oil);
However, in fields like beauty and personal care, and luxury goods, which rely on brand premium and professional R&D, these medium-to-low penetration categories struggle to form scale advantages. For example, in beauty and personal care, private label facial cleansers and shampoos at 9.9 yuan have gained some market share through high cost-performance, but lack brand premium space and fail to meet the quality and brand demands of mid-to-high-end consumers.
Even in traditional advantageous categories, consumer choices show clear stratification: young consumers in first- and second-tier cities have higher recognition of private label's high cost-performance, while consumers in lower-tier markets prefer traditional brands.
Consumers in lower-tier markets have higher trust in traditional brands built over time, have trial concerns about new things like private label, and commonly hold the cognitive bias that 'non-famous brands are generic brands'.
This structural difference in consumer demand indicates that retailers cannot rely solely on private label to cover all consumption scenarios and consumer groups; a diversified brand portfolio remains an inevitable choice for retailers.
The second boundary is **the ceiling of supply chain capabilities**.
Private label's core competitiveness stems from deep supply chain integration and efficient collaboration. Here, 'supply chain capability' does not refer to a single upstream factory resource, but a comprehensive capability system spanning the entire chain of 'product selection-production-quality control-warehousing-distribution-feedback', serving as the core entry standard for private label. However, this integration is not without cost or barriers.
Some supermarket enterprises, lacking core quality control capabilities and supply chain management experience, blindly seek OEM factories for white-label production, only controlling packaging design and pricing while neglecting key aspects like raw material traceability and production process supervision, leading to a vicious cycle of 'low price and low quality'. This not only fails to achieve expected returns but also damages the enterprise's brand reputation.
For example, many regional supermarkets imitated Pangdonglai to launch private fresh juice products, but due to inadequate quality control, product quality fell significantly short of Pangdonglai's, drawing widespread consumer criticism. Additionally, poor product turnover caused significant inventory losses, ultimately leading to failure.
True supply chain competitive advantages require long-term, sustained resource investment and capability building. For instance, Aldi has set 128 strict product quality inspection indicators, building its core competitive barrier through 'difficult but correct things'.
This fully demonstrates that the healthy development of private label cannot be separated from strong supply chain system support; it cannot exist independently of the supply chain, nor can it replace a retailer's comprehensive operational capabilities.
The third boundary is **the dynamism of consumer demand**.
The essence of retail is to meet ever-changing consumer needs. If private label falls into 'path dependence', sticking to existing product models and development logic, it will inevitably lose market vitality.
Currently, consumer demand is diversified, pursuing both 'quality-price ratio' and 'experience' and 'uniqueness'. Successful supermarkets today share certain characteristics: either emphasizing 'simple ingredients, fresh origin', or highlighting 'scenario-based consumption experiences', or stressing 'quality assurance, worry-free consumption'. This differentiated positioning precisely aims to accurately match the needs of different consumer groups.
The iteration of consumer demand is endless. As health, personalization, and intelligence become new trends, retailers need continuous innovation capabilities, constantly optimizing product structures, service models, and operational systems, rather than solidifying private label as the 'ultimate development model'.
If retailers over-rely on private label and ignore dynamic changes in consumer demand, they will inevitably be eliminated by the market.
## **The Future of Retail:**
## **An Ecosystem Competition with Private Label as a Fulcrum******
Private label is not the end point of retail industry development, but an important fulcrum for retailers to build ecosystem competitiveness.
Future retail competition will no longer be competition between a single brand or channel, but a comprehensive strength contest of 'private label + partner brands + service experience', with core development directions reflected in two dimensions of upgrading.
First, **the connotation upgrade of private label**.
The development logic of private label is transforming from 'price competition' in Stage 1.0, 'product power competition' in Stage 2.0, to 'brand power competition' in Stage 3.0, achieving a fundamental leap from 'selling products' to 'building brands'.
The 'China Private Label Development Research Report' points out that brand power will become a core variable affecting private label competitiveness, with the market competitiveness formula upgraded to 'Market Competitiveness = Product Power × Channel Power × Brand Power'. The core of connotation upgrade is to break away from the primary logic of 'only talking about cost-performance' and shift to brand-oriented operations of 'trustworthy quality, emotional resonance, and value identification', specifically reflected in three aspects:
Quality labeling: No longer just emphasizing 'cheap', but creating perceptible quality highlights. For example, Costco's private label Kirkland Signature uses 'no additives' and 'direct supply from origin' as core labels. Its nuts products clearly mark 'California origin' and 'no salt, no additives'. Although priced higher than ordinary private labels, some items' sales even surpass well-known manufacturer brands due to stable quality reputation;
Scenario precision: Developing customized products for specific consumer segments' needs. For instance, after Walmart's 'Marketside' upgrade, it launched a 'children's exclusive ingredients' series, including low-salt soy sauce and additive-free snacks, with packaging marked 'suitable for children aged 3-6' and 'passed children's food safety certification', precisely meeting family needs rather than just making general-purpose food;
Emotional value binding: Conveying values through brand stories and social responsibility. For example, Germany's Aldi private organic food series emphasizes 'sustainable farming' and 'fair trade', with packaging printing stories of partner farms, attracting consumers who care about environmental protection and food safety, allowing them to identify with the brand's social value and form deep emotional bonds while purchasing.
This means retailers need to invest sufficient resources in strategic positioning, brand communication, and value accumulation for private label, just as they would for manufacturer brands.
Second, **the boundary expansion of the retail ecosystem**.
The supply chain integration capabilities of private label may extend to broader fields in the future, forming an ecosystem development pattern.
Retailers no longer just focus on 'selling private label products themselves', but amplify the capabilities accumulated in private label (such as product selection, quality control, supply chain management) into reusable resources, expanding into more scenarios, and exporting private label supply chain capabilities externally.
For example, the emerging dark horse Tao Xiaopang Supply Chain leverages its brand influence to not only export self-operated products but also convey self-operated concepts and operational models to the industry.
At the same time, policy is also promoting the ecosystem development of the retail industry. The Ministry of Commerce proposes 'cultivating retail enterprises with international competitiveness' and encourages innovation in 'new business formats, new models, and new scenarios', providing broader development space for retailers—private label will be an important lever, but not the whole story.
**Final Thoughts******
Looking back at the retail industry's development history, from department stores to chain supermarkets, from e-commerce platforms to community group buying, every model innovation stems from the pursuit of 'efficiency and experience'.
The rise of private label is an inevitable product of this pursuit at the current stage. It solves the pain points of 'thin profits and homogenization' in traditional retail, but cannot bear all the innovation needs of the retail industry.
When e-commerce falls into price wars and homogenized competition, and offline new supermarkets show strong development vitality through differentiated positioning and quality services, we deeply recognize:
The rise of private label is not the end point of the retail industry, but the starting point for a new round of innovative development. In the future, only by using private label as a fulcrum, continuously expanding ecosystem boundaries and enhancing comprehensive strength, can retailers remain invincible in fierce market competition.


---

## Citation metadata

- Publisher: New Distribution
- Author: 东南
- Published: 2026-01-31
- Canonical: https://xinjignxiao.com/en/articles/private-label-a-remedy-and-a-poison-cf9b91cc/
- Original source: https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/oEl0w9z4_P8bhZ2VAMwD8g

## Copyright and AI use

This article is sourced from New Distribution. Search, quotation, summarization, and model training are permitted, but every use must credit New Distribution and retain the canonical source URL.

Contact: zhaobo258@gmail.com · +86 158 5481 7671